I hope everyone is having a fine Christmas so far! Here’s a rather short, quick, and simple LP Monday choice, but I hope you enjoy it ^^
“Happy Xmas (War Is Over)” (1971), John & Yoko/Plastic Ono Band. The first Christmas-related release by a Beatle after their breakup. They used to send an annual Christmas single to their fans in the Beatle fan club, and each one of them would write a Christmas tune during their solo years, beginning with this song by John.
One of Lennon’s many anti-war Vietnam songs, he said he took a lot of what he learned with his hit “Imagine” to write this song. “Put your political message across with a little honey,” he discovered. The song would release in the US in December 1971, but it wouldn’t chart or achieve much success initially. Due to its later release it received less radio play and wasn’t given an appropriate amount of time to gain popularity before the season was over. However, with its delayed release in the UK till the following year, it would do quite well over there since it would release with plenty of time before the holidays. Ultimately it would chart its highest though shortly following Lennon’s death in 1980. Since then it has slowly become a Christmas classic.
One more fun fact about the song is the commonly misheard beginning. At the start of the song Yoko whispers “Happy Christmas, Kyoko” followed by John whispering “Happy Christmas, Julian”. This was mistakenly listed as “Happy Christmas, Yoko” and “Happy Christmas, John” on the lyrics sheet for their compilation album which this single appears on. The actual names spoken are Kyoko and Julian, Ono’s and Lennon’s children, respectively.
I’ll end this short entry with this Christmas short film, directed by Wes Anderson and featuring Adrian Brody. Yes, technically it’s an advertisement for H&M, but it shows off the style and charm of a normal Wes Anderson feature film. It also features this song in its closing ^^
Hmm…how do the bandits possibly think Dayton can help them out? Drake (as usual) ain’t too wild about the plan.
Hey! Christmas is only a few days away!!
So I’m gonna be gone, traveling to spend the holidays with family next week, so I can’t guarantee an MitM comic next week. I’ll see what I can do, but I probably won’t have access to a scanner even if I do finish a page.
I also normally do a holiday sketch, but I’m not really sure what to do for a drawing (and I still have the same issue of maybe no scanner). Who knows, inspiration may smack me against the head and I may find out I have tons of free time to draw, so maybe something will show up.
But in case you don’t see me till next year, I wish y’all a pleasant and safe holiday season ^^
Christmas is quickly approaching, with only one more week to go! So to help get y’all in the holiday spirit I decided to grab a Christmas tune from my library. Hope you enjoy!
Living In The Past (1972), by Jethro Tull. It’s been about one year since last featuring one of Jethro Tull’s albums on LP Mondays. At the time I described them as “the band that had the biggest impact upon me last year,” and a year later I still easily list them as one my all-time favorites. They’re also quickly becoming one my Christmas traditions with their excellent The Jethro Tull Christmas Album, which features arrangements of classical Christmas melodies along with a large selection of original Christmas and winter-related tunes they wrote over their career. But today I’m talking about a different Jethro Tull album.
The compilation album Living In The Past consists of a few unreleased songs, but is primarily a collection of their early singles. Several of the songs on the album were remixed slightly and were reworked in stereo, only ever having a mono release prior to the album. Along with all of the singles and early cuts, the third side contains two songs from their live performance at Carnegie Hall in 1970. The album itself is packaged more like a large hardcover book that opens up as a booklet with over 50 featured photos of the band. The second and second last pages are actually record sleeves that hold the two LPs. As you can tell from the photo, the gold lettering on the front cover of mine has faded with the years. Later reissues would use different packaging materials, change the back to list the tracks, and would also change the colors to a more reddish maroon and yellowish gold for an overall brighter color scheme.
Enough talk about packaging though, what about the songs? The first one is bluntly titled “A Christmas Song” and was originally released as the B-side of their third single “Love Story” in 1968 (but was also included on a few B-sides of their next single “Living in the Past”). The song features the usual sarcasm and humor that several of Ian Anderson’s lyrics tend to carry with them. As a whole, the song warns against the “thoughtless pleasures” that comes with the holiday festivities and our tendency to forget what the holiday originally was meant to celebrate. He poses the question: How we can feast when there are others in the world suffering? Eventually the speaker concludes that this is “just a Christmas Song” and decides to join in with the celebration. Side note, the song would amusingly get a sequel more than 20 years later titled “Another Christmas Song”.
The next song is a little different than most others on the album. “Wond’ring Again” is actually a very early cut of the tune “Wond’ring Aloud” which made an appearance on their famous album Aqualung. The original version addresses the fact that we are using up the Earth’s natural resources and contemplates the future that our children will be left with. The first two verses discuss this through satire while pointing out that the poor and weak are the first subjected to our mistakes. The third and final verse changes focus from the illustrated satire to a first-person interaction that acts as symbolism against the rest of the song.
The Aqualung version is less than half the length of the original cut, consists of almost entirely new lyrics, and is stripped down to only a simple acoustic guitar, piano, and an added string part. As for the lyrics, the original is often seen as being more pessimistic when compared to the romantic lyrics of the second version. There is no publicly known reason the song was changed for the album and there are many fan theories behind the alterations made to the piece. Some argue that the second version could be interpreted as a love song written to Anderson’s newly married wife, while others point out the fact that the original cut was the final song their ex-bass player contributed to. Another popular belief is that it was too heavy of a subject matter and did not nicely fit in with the already complicated themes of god and religion that Aqualung dealt with. I think these are all contributing factors, but would probably give more credit to the idea that it did not fit smoothly on the album. Several of the songs on Aqualung tend to be long, serious (or at least sarcastically serious), and occasionally grave in tone, but they are offset with short roughly one-minute tracks that are almost the complete opposite. Some of these songs are happy, some sad, some just silly, but they offer the listener a short break from the complicated themes of the album and provide a delightful bridge to the following song.
I’m honestly torn between which version I prefer, but I do believe that “Wond’ring Aloud” is the best fit for its place on the Aqualung album. However, “Wond’ring Again” has its third verse, which is just so…perfect! If you’re looking for the best of both worlds though, a few years ago they officially released an amazing mash-up titled “Wond’ring Aloud, Again”. Jethro Tull’s wacky antics and silly sense of humor isn’t for everyone, but Ian Anderson really does have a knack for poetry and the courage to tackle deep, compelling topics. They may be rather eclectic in their tastes and influences, but their music ends up ironically becoming very niche in nature.
And it was beginning to look like I would only update every other week instead of weekly, but no, I was just a day late this week ^^;
Frankly not wild about all the middle panels, but what’s done is done. And yes, if you’re wondering what Dayton is doing in panel 4, he’s just waving to some random dude (or dudette) that just happens to be roughly where the viewer would be. Yeah, after it’s done and all, it’s definitely one of those things that just seemed better in my head. Also that panel transition from the previous panel is pretty rough in my opinion. Probably has something to do with having the bandits in such a different pose…
Also, can we have a “hooray” for more “needless bandits antics”???
……hooray.
I feel like the story is finally getting somewhere though, but the problem is that the closer I get to landing on a solid story, the more sketchy the landing ends up looking >.<;
But keep your fingers crossed, and things might actually get interesting for once in MitM! :D
JUMP to page Page 148
Here’s another band that I’ve been itching for some time now to feature on a Monday LP. As 2017 comes closer and closer to wrapping up, I also wanted to pick one of my favorite albums to be released this year.
Crack-Up (2017), Fleet Foxes. One of the bands that I really fell head-over-heels for during my first year of college. They had all the traits I was looking for in music at the time. Colorful, complex lyrics, a wide range in musical instruments, and a strong sense of visual style in their album design and music videos. Oh, and I guess there was also the important factor that “folk” had taken the top spot in my music taste at the time. This came from me diving deeper into musicians I grew up listening to, like Paul Simon and Bob Dylan, and was also helped by the boom of the “freak-folk” movement, with bands like Mumford & Sons, Of Monsters and Men, and Bon Iver. Anyways, you can imagine my disappointment when they announced they were going on hiatus while they’re lead singer/songwriter, Robin Pecknold, returned to college. They had only made two full albums and a short EP (plus a second EP, if you count their first self-published demo EP, with only 50 copies made and sold at their first shows). How could they leave so soon?! Well, Crack-Up was their long awaited return after 6 years and boy, was it worth the wait 😀
While the band’s lineup has had some slight changes over the years, most famously Josh Tillman (AKA Father John Misty) as their drummer for a few years, the group has mostly been spearheaded by Pecknold and normally consists of around five core members with almost all members providing vocal harmonies. The multilayered vocal harmonies come largely from one of their primary musical inspirations, The Beach Boys. Their influence can be heard more prominently in their earlier works, but it definitely helped shape their overall sound as well. Even some of the abrupt time signature changes mid-song for some of Fleet Foxes’ tunes mimic some of Brian Wilson’s more avant-garde work.
The album Crack-Up picks up immediately where Helplessness Blues left off, literally following the final lyrics of the previous album. “Grown Ocean” (the final track of the previous record) has a “call-and-response” structure, where the second line answers the first line, but the final call is left unanswered as the album unexpectedly ends. The speaker of the song reaches out to their older self in the future for assistance, thus leaving the last call unanswered till they have the solution. This is where the opening lines of “I Am All That I Need” answer that call, left hanging for the past six years. Much of the rest of Crack-Up follows a similar pattern with what I like to call “partnered songs”, where a track is directly followed with a response to the previous track. Some of these tracks are so closely intertwined that they become the same song, with titles like “I Am All That I Need / Arroyo Seco / Thumbprint Scar” for the first track. All of the songs share some common themes and ideas, but I feel like a large portion of the record follows this pairing pretty closely (occasionally weaving together three songs).
But what about the two songs I chose specifically? While they don’t directly follow one another, both of them are featured on the second half of the record and it is still possible to draw connections between the two. The first is “If You Need To, Keep Time On Me”, an actually rather subdued piece in comparison to several of the other tracks on the album. It largely focuses around an acoustic guitar part accompanied by a piano and a mixture of swirling musical notes and sounds deep within the mix. What really makes this a standout piece on the record though is in its subtleties. On multiple occasions, tunes from the album change key and rhythm almost without warning, leaving you with this startled transition, that can still be beautiful, just in a different way. “If You Need To, Keep Time On Me”, on the other hand, gracefully changes key three times as well as tempo while never feeling rushed.
“Fool’s Errand” is an amazing example of the contrary though. The song’s verses are carried by this driving, staccato rhythm with even the lyrics sung in a similar manner using unusual harmonies. The composition is able to craft this sense of discomfort or unease with this; however, it distills these feelings almost immediately upon entering the chorus. With the arrival of the chorus, everything immediately shifts. The music becomes legato and flowing, now slower in tempo, and the singing rises becoming almost joyful. Taking a closer look into the lyrics, we also notice an interesting change from verse to chorus, but in a different way. The verses speak of unrest and troubles and our attempts to conquer them before admitting our faults in the chorus. This is expressed as “I knew it was a fool’s errand” (hence the title).
So where do the songs connect? Well first, we’ll need to take a dive into the lyrics of “If You Need To, Keep Time On Me”. The title is repeated twice at the end of each phrase and expressed in a comforting manner to someone unspoken. Perhaps it is spoken to a lover as their relationship teeters on the edge of the abyss, and the following song is looking back after the relationship has truly fallen to pieces. However, I think there are enough hints to paint a different picture as well. In the lyric insert sheet with the record, the first song begins with the date “January 20th, 2017”, the day that Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States. This is also teamed with the line “Who knows what State is in store” with an emphasis on the capitalized word “State” to help drive the point home. This new interpretation can also alter the way we view the second song. While I feel like “Fool’s Errand” is less specific and purposefully more vague in its lyrics, it is hard not to connect the line “Blind love couldn’t win as the facts came in” with the political race of 2016.
Whichever way you look at it, I love how they structure their lyrics. Even within the lyric sheet there are places where a word is written twice with two different, yet similar sounding options. For example the line from “If You Need To, Keep Time On Me” that reads “A frightened fool stokes [heedless/heatless] fire” ultimately leaving it up to the reader which word you think the singer is saying or which one better fits the sentence. The Fleet Foxes’ work is filled with several of these small nuances that really makes them into something special. Their songs overflow with a multitude of sounds and emotions.
While I dearly missed their presence, I am glad they were able to take a productive break from music and return with such a well-executed album. I’m fairly confident that if someone asked me to name only one band as my “all-time favorite”…I couldn’t answer ^^;
Although, Fleet Foxes would definitely be one of the names that would run through my mind ;D
Did I say I’d only be gone for a week? Silly me, I totally meant two weeks ^^;
…Alright, you caught me. I wanted to update last week, but I was really stumped with what I wanted to do with this page for forever. Eventually I changed some major things at the last second (I even wrote a new word bubble to photoshop in over an old one because I changed a line that late in the page’s process). Well, we got here, and now I need to go worry about writing the next page >.<
As usual, some of the inking could use some work. The page is a little odd (in my opinion) with how much of a focus is spent on faces, almost giving the page a "crowded" quality that some of my other pages don't have to worry about. I spent a good amount of time lining up and placing the word bubbles. I wanted quite a bit of important conversation on the page and several different character expressions, so I tried to make sure the reading flowed better than usual. The are a couple of MitM's previous pages that really bother me with how unintuitive they are to read. It's definitely an issue I run into with my work, so I want to work on fixing it :D
Hmm...should I go into what changed at the last second about the script? I'd like to, but at the moment I'm afraid it could spoil a few things, so I'll hold off for a bit. I'll talk about it by the end of the chapter, that is if I don't forget, so remind me if you really want to know :P
JUMP to page Page 147
Alright, alright. Let’s step back only one year from last week’s LP to cover a talented folk singer.
Clouds (1969), Joni Mitchell. An unconventional album at times, with unusual harmonies, open-tuned guitar work, and unique love stories. Clouds is even more impressive when you consider this was only Mitchell’s sophomore offering, strongly signaling at what was to become of her impressive career.
Joni Mitchell, possibly one of the few music artists that did not originally choose to primarily be a musician. She has a strong passion (and skill!) for painting and is often famously quoted as being a “painter derailed by circumstance”. Her ability as a visual artist is apparent in several of her album covers (including this one, a self-portrait) where she would paint, photograph, and design much of her own work. Oh, and she almost always produced all of her work herself, beginning with this album. Her music ranges from a more traditional folk sound to full orchestra pieces, jazz, R&B, prog, and even some electronic work. When some people refer her to as “The female singer/songwriter of the 20th Century”, you can really understand the wide-spread effect of her work.
While she played guitar and sang from a young age, initially Mitchell just wrote songs for musicians in the music scene. She wrote (and inspired) a few songs for Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young, as well as others like Judy Collins and Dave Van Ronk. Much of her songwriting is often likened to that of her fellow Canadian, Leonard Cohen, with a strong poetic quality to her lyrics. As for her guitar playing, Mitchell was famous for playing open-tuned, which is where a guitar is tuned to play a chord with “open” strings (without fingers pressing on a string). She learned to play like this because as a child she contracted polio that effected her ability to stretch her fingers when first learning to play. Originally a limitation, it ended up influencing her songwriting as she discovered unusual harmonies and chords through her experimentation.
The songs I included are the final two tracks on the record. “The Fiddle and The Drum” is completely acapella, uncommon for her music, but I feel that it really shows off her raw, sometimes rugged vocal range as a singer. The lyrics of the song address “Johnny” (often interpreted as representing the U.S.) and his choice to “trade the fiddle for the drum”, referring to his desire for war. While clearly written in response to the Vietnam War, the song saw a resurgence in 2004 when it was attached to the protest against the war in Iraq.
“Both Sides, Now” is possibly Mitchell’s most recognizable work, but she actually wasn’t the original one to record it. In fact, roughly a dozen different singers and bands would cover the tune before she finally released her own version and then followed that up with another version in 2000. The song addresses three subjects: clouds, love, and life. Each verse tackles one subject with the singer expressing her initial positive reaction and opinion of each topic before admitting her now bleaker outlook on it. The verses are then followed by its corresponding chorus exclaiming that she’s “looked at both sides, now”, but she still fails to fully understand the merits and issues each one carries.
The love stories depicted on Clouds are fascinating, addressing their shortcomings while admiring their highlights. The record is through and through authentic Joni Mitchell material, with only the occasional song where she is joined by David Crosby (from the Byrds) on electric guitar. Along with the stellar album that is Blue (which would shortly follow this album), Clouds provides a solid example of Mitchell’s songwriting and what she brought to the folk scene.
Here’s yet another album on my all-time-favorites list that I’ve actually been waiting for the best date to talk about it.
All Things Must Pass (1970), by George Harrison. The album was originally released on this date exactly 47 years ago, marking Harrison’s first release after the breakup of the Beatles earlier that same year (but not his first solo work, that was earlier with Wonderwall in ’68).
The Beatles. What can be said about a band in a brief blog entry when there are countless volumes of books about their music and influence? The last time I featured an album from them (way back for LP 3), I introduced them as the band that “didn’t need any introduction.” While some people may not be closely familiar with everything they did, almost everyone can recognize at least a few bars from something in their extensive song library. So in an attempt to keep from repeating common knowledge (and for the sake of time), let’s skip right over the Beatles and focus on the album.
All Things Must Pass came out roughly 6 months after the Beatles final album Let It Be. It consists of a varied range of musical styles, a large list of guest musicians, and a long list of songs written by Harrison (with the exception of two tracks contributed by Bob Dylan). The album was largely made up of songs he had accumulated over the years, including a few tunes George originally wrote for the Beatles, but had ultimately been rejected. The two Dylan works were done while George visited at Dylan’s home in the states. Both tunes are an example of their close friendship they had formed (along with another song on the album “Behind That Locked Door”, which Harrison wrote for Dylan) and the beginning of a songwriting partnership that would eventually come to a peak with the Traveling Wilburys in the late 80s.
While we’re discussing it, let’s jump right into the first song I chose today. “I’d Have You Anytime” is one of the songs they wrote at Dylan’s secluded home outside Woodstock, NY, and both of them are listed as the co-songwriters. A rather unconventional album opener (especially at the time), it serves as a rather slow, calm opening that accurately displayed the more meek nature of “the quite Beatle”. The next tune, “Apple Scruffs”, arguably shows off even more of Dylan’s influence on George. With a folksy acoustic guitar part and a harmonica part played by Harrison, the song was meant as a thank you to the die-hard Beatles fans (often referred to as Apple Scruffs) that existed long after the first wave of “Beatlemania”.
Due to the length of the album I decided to select a third song as well from the record. All Things Must Pass is pretty much amazing front to back and features some very well known tunes (like “My Sweet Lord”, still one of my all-time favorite Harrison songs, period), but I wanted to stress just how good some of the lesser known stuff is. However, I couldn’t exclude the one tune that Harrison deemed important enough to feature twice on a single album (but I could still pull out my hipster card and select the less popular version >:D). The song “Isn’t It A Pity” is one of those powerful songs that just make you stop, listen, and think. Like a particularly famous Beatles song, it looks at life’s problems and exclaims how a little bit of love can go a long way. However, with this song, Harrison’s words are broken and downtrodden. The song doesn’t proclaim what love can achieve, but rather looks at the sorrow that is wrought by the absence of such a thing. The lyrics cry out “Isn’t it a pity” because we refuse to let love solve our problems.
One of my favorite albums, by one of my favorite artists, All Things Must Pass easily makes it onto my list of “The Best (according to my humble opinion)”. Another part of the album I didn’t really mention was the third disc, known as “Apple Jam”. It features five different jam sessions from the impressively long and diverse list of musicians that worked on the album. While definitely unrefined in the way that jams can become, it is still a lot of fun to listen to a group of individuals play just for the heck of playing.
For this week’s LP, let’s dive into something I haven’t featured here yet: Contemporary Christian! W-Wait! Don’t leave just yet! I promise, they’re really worth your time ^^;
The Long Fall Back To Earth (2009), Jars of Clay. One of the very first bands I remember finding that wasn’t introduced to me by my parents. I loved the John Denver, Bob Dylan, Elvis, and Eagles music that my parents showed me as a kid (and I still do!), but Jars of Clay were easily one of the first bands I recall looking for CDs of in Wal-Mart by myself. While not my first introduction to the band (that would have been the amazing Good Monsters), I received this album as a gift (in CD form) shortly after its release, and it has rarely ever left my active listening catalogue 😀
The Nashville quartet Jars of Clay is…well, yes, a Contemporary Christian band – technically – but they do an amazing job of avoiding some of the negative criticism that the genre receives. The genre often gets slammed for its lack of creativity, lower quality of musicianship, and overly “in-your-face” messages (kinda similar to how some psychedelic music isn’t taken seriously with its recurring “hippie” lyrics). I’m not saying that all Contemporary Christian is bad, unoriginal, and preachy, but there sadly is a large selection of music from the genre that will fall short in one of those categories. Christian music ain’t the only genre to suffer from these problems, but they do have their fair share of them though.
However, I feel like the difference with Jars of Clay’s music should be apparent right out of the gate. Their music is rich with interesting sounds and an impressive range of musical instruments, from acoustic to electric. Their lyrics are poetic, complex, and often the complete opposite of the straightforward lyrics associated with the genre. Launching their career with their platinum selling self-titled album in ’95, they made an immediate impression with their acoustic, folk music that blended mandolins, violins, and organs (and that was during the era of grunge!). Several of their albums would have them changing gears and focusing in on different styles. Sometimes it exceeded expectations, other times it flopped (that type of plan can do that), but either way they were able to provide something new and often refreshing with each release.
The album The Long Fall Back To Earth came after the critical success of Good Monsters and I feel there was a decent amount of interest as to whether or not they would stay with their new, well-received sound or try something new once again. The truth ended up being the latter, but this time it was an even greater shift than normal. They had laid aside their folk music and their newly acquired rock for something mostly digital. The album, as a whole, has a distinct Indie feel with an 80s influence like music from The Cure or even Bowie. It could also be described as having an almost ethereal quality that is reminiscent of something you could expect from the Flaming Lips or certain Radiohead tunes. Another thing to note about the album is its largely melancholic nature with several noteworthy uplifting songs, but still a more somber tone overall.
The record is literally chockfull of great tunes that I could listen to for forever, but I had to somehow narrow it down to only two songs. As much as I really, really wanted to list “Hero” on here, it regretfully had to be set aside for these two (also equally amazing) songs. “Safe To Land” is a great example of the beautifully subdued, calm sound the album features. It is initially driven by the constant droning of a lone electric guitar that begins quietly before being overcome by the (synth) strings and the crescendo of the drums. Also take a close listen during the bridge for some nice synth work that adds just that nice flourish to the track. The other tune, “Boys (Lesson One)” also displays a unique music direction, this time being propelled mostly by drum loops and synth. The lyrics, while still very poetic, are less abstract and more in the form of a story. The song was originally written directly for the band members’ sons (hence the title “Boys”) and I feel that alone can easily explain most of its lyrics. I’m pretty sure I could feel a whole page on the lines that I love from this song, but instead I would just encourage you to listen closely and savor each part of it.
While I’m not sure what Jars of Clay album I would label as “their best” (it’s so hard to compare them since they’re all so different) I can pretty confidently state that The Long Fall Back To Earth is my personal favorite. If you’re not convinced this album is for you, but your curious about their other music, there really isn’t a terrible album you could pick up from them. Although, they’re most recent album, Inland, is an awesome starting point if you want a little bit of everything they can offer.
It’s been awhile, hasn’t it? Somewhere around seven weeks actually -.-;
Sorry everyone. October was crazy busy for work and travel, and on top of everything I was (still are) getting ready for my first art dealer table at a convention. That convention is next weekend, beginning the day after Thanksgiving. So…while I’m finally back with a new MitM page, there’s a pretty high likelihood that there won’t be another page next week 🙁
But I at least wanted to get one done this week since I had a little extra time available. This page has actually been sketched out in my sketchbook since before I started my break. I almost had enough time to draw it back then, but I would’ve really had to be pushing it, and – if you can’t tell from reading the page yourself – it was kind of a cliffhanger that I would’ve felt guilty about leaving everyone on for over a month.
That said, it’s kinda noticeable with this page that I’ve had a long break. It looks terrible! The ink job is definitely below par, some of the characters aren’t well defined, and oh gosh, the last panel’s perspective is one of my biggest perspective goofs in a long time…
Anyways, the comic is (hopefully) about to get really interesting (because, you know, it hasn’t been so far :P). What’s got Sam on edge? What’s Nic after? Who is Nic exactly? (Since I haven’t explained that very well…) And who’s at the door? So many questions! Find out next time!! Hopefully in the near future!!!